min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery

28.3k citations
2.0k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications 237
    • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 201
    • Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment 198
    • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment 210

min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery

1.8k papers receiving 24.1k citations

Peers

min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
  • Neurology 8.1k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 5.5k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 4.3k
  • Genetics 2.4k
  • Surgery 8.1k
Replace Neurosurgery Clinics of North America with:
Neurosurgery Clinics of North America United States
Seminars in Neurology United States
Neurologic Clinics United States
Journal of Neuroimaging United States
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports United States
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society South Korea
Journal of Human Genetics Japan
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology United States
Neuroimaging Clinics of North America United States
Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery United States
min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery relative to Neurosurgery Clinics of North America United States Neurosurgery Clinics of North America's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Neurosurgery Clinics of North America · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery more than expected).

Fields of papers published in min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery.

About min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery

The 2.0k papers published in min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery in the last decades have received a total of 28.3k indexed citations . Papers published in min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery usually cover Neurology (752 papers), Genetics (220 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (399 papers), Surgery (718 papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (283 papers) specifically the topics of Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (385 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (257 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (237 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (229 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (210 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (201 papers), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (198 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (188 papers). The most active scholars publishing in min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery are H.-D. Jho, Peter J. Jannetta, Alessandra Alfieri, Enrico de Divitiis, Paolo Cappabianca, M. Gazi Yaşargil, Karsten Voigt, Sebastian Ruetten, Georgios Godolias and H. K. Shahinian.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact