Middle East Quarterly

544 papers and 1.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 544 papers published in Middle East Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Middle East Quarterly usually cover Sociology and Political Science (305 papers), Political Science and International Relations (234 papers) and Education (31 papers) specifically the topics of Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (154 papers), Politics of Islamic Reform in Middle East (85 papers) and Middle East Politics and Society (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Middle East Quarterly are Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, Phyllis Chesler, Azar Nafisi, Daniel Pipes, Bruce Maddy‐Weitzman, Martin Krämer, Efraim Karsh, Lorenzo Vidino, Steven Plaut and Michael Rubin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Middle East Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Middle East Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Middle East Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Middle East Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Middle East Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Middle East Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Middle East Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025