New Medit

319 papers and 1.6k indexed citations

About

The 319 papers published in New Medit in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in New Medit usually cover General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (68 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (58 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (56 papers) specifically the topics of Agriculture and Rural Development Research (47 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (34 papers) and Organic Food and Agriculture (33 papers). The most active scholars publishing in New Medit are Giulio Malorgio, Olga Iakovidou, Boubaker Dhehibi, Garyfallos Arabatzis, Constantine Iliopoulos, Alessandro Sorrentino, Carlo Russo, Luca Cacchiarelli, Emanuele Schimmenti and Luca Salvati.

In The Last Decade

New Medit

270 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Fields of papers published in New Medit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in New Medit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in New Medit.

Countries where authors publish in New Medit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in New Medit. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in New Medit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Medit more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026