Daniel Pıpes

2.0k citations
81 papers · 852 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Pıpes

60 papers receiving 655 citations

Peers

Daniel Pıpes
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Political Science and International Relations 323
  • Sociology and Political Science 583
  • Anthropology 78
  • Communication 39
  • Religious studies 26
Replace Roger Allen with:
Roger Allen United States
Jonathan D. Spence United States
Robert Irwin United States
Norman Cohn
Peter Goodrich United States
Martin Bernal United States
Allan Megill United States
James M. Penning United States
Derk Bodde United States
Burton Raffel United States
Daniel Pıpes relative to Roger Allen United States Roger Allen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Roger Allen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Pıpes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Pıpes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Pıpes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Pıpes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Pıpes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Pıpes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Pıpes. The network helps show where Daniel Pıpes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Pıpes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Pıpes Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Pıpes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998156
2
In the Path of God: Islam and Political Power
198354
3
Militant Islam Reaches America
200251
4 199348
5 198542
6 198439
7 198236
8
Hamas vs. Fatah: The Struggle For Palestine
200830
9 199630
10 198628
11 199022
12 199322
13
Sacred Trash: The Lost and Found World of the Cairo Geniza
201121
14 199919
15 198219
16 198318
17 198315
18 199315
19 199314
20 198513

About Daniel Pıpes

Daniel Pıpes is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology, Education and Archeology, having authored 81 papers that have together received 852 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Studies and History (23 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (19 papers), Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (13 papers), Middle East Politics and Society (8 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (8 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (7 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (5 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (323 citations), Sociology and Political Science (583 citations), Anthropology (78 citations), Communication (39 citations) and Religious studies (26 citations). Daniel Pıpes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Francis Fukuyama, Donald Reid, Michael G. Morony, John C. Campbell, William B. Quandt, Emmanuel Sivan, Samuel Ζ. Klausner, Misagh Parsa, John C. Campbell and Patrick Clawson. Their work appears in journals such as Orbis, Foreign Affairs, The American Historical Review, Middle East Quarterly and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact