Daniel Pıpes

2.0k citations
91 papers · 1.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Pıpes

62 papers receiving 847 citations

Peers

Daniel Pıpes
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Political Science and International Relations 495
  • Classics 67
  • Sociology and Political Science 723
  • Anthropology 156
  • Archeology 127
Replace Jonathan D. Spence with:
Jonathan D. Spence United States
Martin Bernal United States
Barbara Burrell United States
Victor Davis Hanson United States
Norman Cohn
Éric Voegelin United States
Lydia G. Cochrane
Steven Grosby United States
Robert Irwin United States
Hugh Trevor-Roper United States
Daniel Pıpes relative to Jonathan D. Spence United States Jonathan D. Spence's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Jonathan D. Spence · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Pıpes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Pıpes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Pıpes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Pıpes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Pıpes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Pıpes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Pıpes. The network helps show where Daniel Pıpes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Pıpes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Pıpes Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Pıpes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998172
2 1985131
3 199394
4
Militant Islam Reaches America
200257
5 198256
6
In the Path of God: Islam and Political Power
198356
7 198242
8 198441
9 198639
10 198537
11 199035
12
Hamas vs. Fatah: The Struggle For Palestine
200834
13 199631
14 199327
15
Sacred Trash: The Lost and Found World of the Cairo Geniza
201126
16 199924
17 198322
18 199316
19 198916
20 198315

About Daniel Pıpes

Daniel Pıpes is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology, Education and Archeology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Studies and History (28 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (21 papers), Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (13 papers), Middle East Politics and Society (9 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (9 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (9 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (7 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (495 citations), Classics (67 citations), Sociology and Political Science (723 citations), Anthropology (156 citations) and Archeology (127 citations). Daniel Pıpes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Francis Fukuyama, Michael G. Morony, Donald Reid, John C. Campbell, Emmanuel Sivan, Misagh Parsa, William B. Quandt, Samuel Ζ. Klausner, John C. Campbell and Patrick Clawson. Their work appears in journals such as Orbis, Foreign Affairs, The American Historical Review, Middle East Quarterly and Journal of Strategic Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact