Countries where authors publish in Microbial Risk Analysis
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Microbial Risk Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Microbial Risk Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Microbial Risk Analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Microbial Risk Analysis
This network shows the impact of papers published in Microbial Risk Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Microbial Risk Analysis.
About Microbial Risk Analysis
The 211 papers published in Microbial Risk Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 2.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Microbial Risk Analysis usually cover Biotechnology (45 papers), Food Science (89 papers), Infectious Diseases (69 papers), Endocrinology (13 papers) and Agronomy and Crop Science (23 papers) specifically the topics of Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (67 papers), Food Safety and Hygiene (61 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (43 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (34 papers), Fecal contamination and water quality (28 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (23 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (23 papers) and SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Microbial Risk Analysis are P. Gale, Marko Popovic, Mary E. Schoen, Jay L. Garland, Maarten Nauta, Jeffrey A. Soller, Michael A. Jahne, Nicholas J. Ashbolt, Laurent Guillier and Úrsula Gonzales-Barrón.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.