Microbial Risk Analysis

206 papers and 2.2k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 206 papers published in Microbial Risk Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Microbial Risk Analysis usually cover Food Science (87 papers), Infectious Diseases (69 papers) and Biotechnology (44 papers) specifically the topics of Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (66 papers), Food Safety and Hygiene (60 papers) and Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Microbial Risk Analysis are P. Gale, Marko Popovic, Mary E. Schoen, Jay L. Garland, Maarten Nauta, Jeffrey A. Soller, Michael A. Jahne, Nicholas J. Ashbolt, Laurent Guillier and Úrsula Gonzales-Barrón.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Microbial Risk Analysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Microbial Risk Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Microbial Risk Analysis.

Countries where authors publish in Microbial Risk Analysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Microbial Risk Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Microbial Risk Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Microbial Risk Analysis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026