Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review

406 papers and 22.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 406 papers published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review in the last decades have received a total of 22.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review usually cover Plant Science (164 papers), Complementary and alternative medicine (100 papers) and Molecular Biology (91 papers) specifically the topics of Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (75 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (72 papers) and Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review are Neelam Chandra, Vijaya Lobo, Anita Phatak, Aishwarya Patil, Subramani Parasuraman, Katrin Sak, Sunil Kumar, S Hemalatha, Tasiu Isah and Farhath Khanum.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review.

Countries where authors publish in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025