Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review

27.8k citations
422 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review

398 papers receiving 25.7k citations

Peers

Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review
Comparison fields: 5 of 208
  • Biochemistry 3.7k
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 4.5k
  • Pharmacology 3.3k
  • Food Science 5.2k
  • Drug Discovery 42
Replace Research Journal of Medicinal Plant with:
Research Journal of Medicinal Plant Nigeria
Advances in Pharmacological Sciences India
Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants India
Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine United States
Oriental Pharmacy and Experimental Medicine India
International Journal of PharmTech Research India
Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology India
Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology United States
Annual Review of Food Science and Technology United States
Current Protocols in Bioinformatics United States
Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review relative to Research Journal of Medicinal Plant Nigeria Research Journal of Medicinal Plant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.2×
Research Journal of Medicinal Plant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review.

About Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review

The 422 papers published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review in the last decades have received a total of 27.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review usually cover Drug Discovery (3 papers), Complementary and alternative medicine (104 papers), Pharmacology (67 papers), Biochemistry (32 papers) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (79 papers) specifically the topics of Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (77 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (74 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (51 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (38 papers), Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants (37 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (30 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (25 papers) and Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review are Neelam Chandra, Aishwarya Patil, Vijaya Lobo, Anita Phatak, Subramani Parasuraman, Katrin Sak, S Hemalatha, Sunil Kumar, Tasiu Isah and Wannee Jiraungkoorskul.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact