This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archaea. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archaea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archaea more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Archaea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archaea.
About Archaea
The 298 papers published in Archaea in the last decades have received a total of 10.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Archaea usually cover Environmental Chemistry (45 papers), Ecology (88 papers), Molecular Biology (209 papers), Pollution (29 papers) and Building and Construction (33 papers) specifically the topics of Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (82 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (63 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (53 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (50 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (48 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (43 papers), Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production (33 papers) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archaea are Yosuke Koga, B.W. McBride, André-Denis G. Wright, Sarah E. Hook, Jörg Soppa, Patrick Forterre, Céline Brochier‐Armanet, Kim Brügger, Roger A. Garrett and Michael Rother.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.