International Reviews in Physical Chemistry

38.6k citations
578 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
    • Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
    • Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
    • Spectroscopy and Laser Applications
    • Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure
    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Papers in

International Reviews in Physical Chemistry

571 papers receiving 37.6k citations

Peers

International Reviews in Physical Chemistry
Comparison fields: 5 of 177
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 22.4k
  • Spectroscopy 11.7k
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 5.1k
  • Atmospheric Science 5.0k
  • Catalysis 1.5k
Replace Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science with:
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science United States
Computers in Physics United States
Advances In Physics United Kingdom
Surface Science Reports United States
Solid state physics United States
Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics United States
Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy United States
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C Photochemistry Reviews Japan
Nature Reviews Chemistry United States
Annual Review of Materials Research United States
International Reviews in Physical Chemistry relative to Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science United States Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Reviews in Physical Chemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Reviews in Physical Chemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Reviews in Physical Chemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Reviews in Physical Chemistry more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Reviews in Physical Chemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Reviews in Physical Chemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Reviews in Physical Chemistry.

About International Reviews in Physical Chemistry

The 578 papers published in International Reviews in Physical Chemistry in the last decades have received a total of 38.6k indexed citations . Papers published in International Reviews in Physical Chemistry usually cover Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (380 papers), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (102 papers), Spectroscopy (186 papers), Atmospheric Science (78 papers) and Catalysis (25 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (259 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (170 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (63 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (61 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (61 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (52 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (50 papers) and Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Reviews in Physical Chemistry are Mostafa A. El‐Sayed, Stephan Link, Sergey Vyazovkin, Joel M. Bowman, Bastiaan J. Braams, Gerard Meijer, Hua Guo, Michael A. Duncan, Lai‐Sheng Wang and Rudy Peeters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact