Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy

2.8k papers and 48.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.8k papers published in Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy in the last decades have received a total of 48.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.8k papers), Molecular Biology (598 papers) and Surgery (575 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (548 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (344 papers) and Heart Failure Treatment and Management (334 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy are Derek M. Yellon, Lionel H. Opie, G. G. Belz, Jawahar L. Mehta, Roberto Bolli, Yochai Birnbaum, David J. Hearse, Robert S. Rosenson, Éric Bruckert and S. Dejager.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy.

Countries where authors publish in Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025