Nature Reviews Rheumatology

2.4k papers and 117.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.4k papers published in Nature Reviews Rheumatology in the last decades have received a total of 117.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Nature Reviews Rheumatology usually cover Rheumatology (1.2k papers), Immunology (679 papers) and Molecular Biology (569 papers) specifically the topics of Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (448 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (438 papers) and Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (239 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature Reviews Rheumatology are Georg Schett, Thomas Dörner, Francis Bérenbaum, Gary S. Firestein, David S. Pisetsky, Kevin Winthrop, Hiroshi Takayanagi, Irving M. Shapiro, Makarand V. Risbud and David J. Hunter.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nature Reviews Rheumatology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature Reviews Rheumatology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

Countries where authors publish in Nature Reviews Rheumatology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature Reviews Rheumatology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature Reviews Rheumatology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature Reviews Rheumatology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025