Acta Petrologica Sinica

4.5k papers and 44.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.5k papers published in Acta Petrologica Sinica in the last decades have received a total of 44.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Petrologica Sinica usually cover Geophysics (2.0k papers), Artificial Intelligence (1.7k papers) and Economics and Econometrics (1.6k papers) specifically the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (1.9k papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (1.7k papers) and Geochemistry and Geochronology of Asian Mineral Deposits (1.6k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Petrologica Sinica are Yanjing Chen, Wu Fu, Mlr Key, Lan Wang, Mao Jing, Shao Ji, Guochun Zhao, Di‐Cheng Zhu, Yongfeng Zhu and Tao Zhou.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta Petrologica Sinica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Petrologica Sinica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Petrologica Sinica.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Petrologica Sinica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Petrologica Sinica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Petrologica Sinica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Petrologica Sinica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025