MDM Policy & Practice

246 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 246 papers published in MDM Policy & Practice in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in MDM Policy & Practice usually cover Economics and Econometrics (101 papers), General Health Professions (91 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (50 papers) specifically the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (84 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (57 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in MDM Policy & Practice are Mary C. Politi, Jeremy D. Goldhaber‐Fiebert, Hans Olav Melberg, Ellen Peters, Odette Wegwarth, John A. Nyman, Felix G. Rebitschek, Lauren E. Cipriano, Gerd Gigerenzer and Michelle McDowell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in MDM Policy & Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in MDM Policy & Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in MDM Policy & Practice.

Countries where authors publish in MDM Policy & Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in MDM Policy & Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in MDM Policy & Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MDM Policy & Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025