Mathematics in Engineering

259 papers and 965 indexed citations i.

About

The 259 papers published in Mathematics in Engineering in the last decades have received a total of 965 indexed citations. Papers published in Mathematics in Engineering usually cover Applied Mathematics (136 papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (101 papers) and Mathematical Physics (76 papers) specifically the topics of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (101 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (94 papers) and Optimal Transport in Geometry and Analysis (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mathematics in Engineering are Siddhartha Mishra, Giuseppe Gaeta, Alfio Quarteroni, Luca Dede’, Angkana Rüland, Matteo Novaga, Jonathan A. D. Wattis, Daniela De Silva, Manuel Friedrich and Gianluigi Rozza.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Mathematics in Engineering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Mathematics in Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mathematics in Engineering.

Countries where authors publish in Mathematics in Engineering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mathematics in Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mathematics in Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathematics in Engineering more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025