Manufacturing Review

282 papers and 3.4k indexed citations

About

The 282 papers published in Manufacturing Review in the last decades have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Manufacturing Review usually cover Mechanical Engineering (200 papers), Mechanics of Materials (68 papers) and Materials Chemistry (65 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced machining processes and optimization (62 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (48 papers) and Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Manufacturing Review are Do Duc Trung, Costas A. Charitidis, Thywill Cephas Dzogbewu, Kevin Chou, Xibing Gong, Ted L. Anderson, Elias P. Koumoulos, Hussien Hegab, Sanjay Kumar Chak and Panagiotis Stavropoulos.

In The Last Decade

Manufacturing Review

260 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Fields of papers published in Manufacturing Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Manufacturing Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Manufacturing Review.

Countries where authors publish in Manufacturing Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Manufacturing Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Manufacturing Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manufacturing Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026