Logical Methods in Computer Science

4.6k citations
796 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Formal Methods in Verification
    • semigroups and automata theory
    • Advanced Algebra and Logic
    • Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Software top 5%
    • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques

Papers in

    • Formal Methods in Verification 316
    • semigroups and automata theory 161
    • Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms 110
    • Advanced Algebra and Logic 73
    • Logic, programming, and type systems 452
    • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 279
    • Semantic Web and Ontologies 46

Logical Methods in Computer Science

649 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Peers

Logical Methods in Computer Science
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 3.3k
  • Software 498
  • Artificial Intelligence 3.4k
  • Hardware and Architecture 281
  • Computer Networks and Communications 765
Replace Journal of Combinatorial Designs with:
Journal of Combinatorial Designs United States
RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications France
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic United States
Programming and Computer Software Russia
Mathematical Structures in Computer Science France
Complex Systems United States
Journal of Discrete Algorithms United States
Acta Cybernetica Hungary
Mathematics of Control Signals and Systems United States
Applicable Algebra in Engineering Communication and Computing United States
Logical Methods in Computer Science relative to Journal of Combinatorial Designs United States Journal of Combinatorial Designs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Journal of Combinatorial Designs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Logical Methods in Computer Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Logical Methods in Computer Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Logical Methods in Computer Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Logical Methods in Computer Science more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Logical Methods in Computer Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Logical Methods in Computer Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Logical Methods in Computer Science.

About Logical Methods in Computer Science

The 796 papers published in Logical Methods in Computer Science in the last decades have received a total of 4.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Logical Methods in Computer Science usually cover Computational Theory and Mathematics (577 papers), Artificial Intelligence (594 papers), Software (63 papers), Geometry and Topology (52 papers) and Computer Networks and Communications (110 papers) specifically the topics of Logic, programming, and type systems (452 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (316 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (279 papers), semigroups and automata theory (161 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (110 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (73 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (46 papers) and Distributed systems and fault tolerance (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Logical Methods in Computer Science are Venanzio Capretta, Matija Pretnar, Gordon Plotkin, Sam Staton, Peter Selinger, Leonid Libkin, Nir Piterman, Krishnendu Chatterjee, Laurent Doyen and Alwen Tiu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact