Psychologische Rundschau

566 papers and 3.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 566 papers published in Psychologische Rundschau in the last decades have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychologische Rundschau usually cover Social Psychology (138 papers), Sociology and Political Science (120 papers) and General Psychology (120 papers) specifically the topics of Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (120 papers), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (43 papers) and Sociology and Education Studies (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychologische Rundschau are Olaf Köller, Ursula M. Staudinger, Wolfgang Ihle, Günter Esser, Oliver Lüdtke, Ulrich Trautwein, Heiner Rindermann, Alexander Robitzsch, Andrea E. Abele and Sven Barnow.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychologische Rundschau

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychologische Rundschau. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychologische Rundschau.

Countries where authors publish in Psychologische Rundschau

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychologische Rundschau. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychologische Rundschau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychologische Rundschau more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025