South East Asia Research

600 papers and 3.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 600 papers published in South East Asia Research in the last decades have received a total of 3.0k indexed citations. Papers published in South East Asia Research usually cover Sociology and Political Science (478 papers), Political Science and International Relations (309 papers) and Anthropology (107 papers) specifically the topics of Asian Studies and History (241 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (226 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (101 papers). The most active scholars publishing in South East Asia Research are Martin van Bruinessen, Peter A. Jackson, Peter Jackson, Edward Aspinall, Andreas Ufen, Saskia E. Wieringa, Michael Buehler, Marcus Mietzner, Lyn Parker and Eva‐Lotta E. Hedman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in South East Asia Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in South East Asia Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in South East Asia Research.

Countries where authors publish in South East Asia Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in South East Asia Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in South East Asia Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites South East Asia Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025