Literature & History

225 papers and 314 indexed citations i.

About

The 225 papers published in Literature & History in the last decades have received a total of 314 indexed citations. Papers published in Literature & History usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (67 papers), Sociology and Political Science (59 papers) and History (53 papers) specifically the topics of Irish and British Studies (20 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (12 papers) and Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (11 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Literature & History are Joe Moran, John M. Kirk, K.A. Jenkins, Sally Ledger, Andrew Thacker, Douglas Kerr, Elizabeth Kraft, David Aers, Anna Snaith and Mary Hammond.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Literature & History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Literature & History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Literature & History.

Countries where authors publish in Literature & History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Literature & History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Literature & History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Literature & History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025