Les études philosophiques

301 papers and 235 indexed citations i.

About

The 301 papers published in Les études philosophiques in the last decades have received a total of 235 indexed citations. Papers published in Les études philosophiques usually cover Philosophy (168 papers), Anthropology (102 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (61 papers) specifically the topics of Historical and Literary Studies (81 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (65 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Les études philosophiques are Frédéric Worms, Jean-Luc Marion, Yves Schwartz, Marwan Rashed, Jean‐François Kervégan, Sandra Laugier, Christopher Brooke, Nathalie Depraz, Riccardo Chiaradonna and Jacques Brunschwig.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Les études philosophiques

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Les études philosophiques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Les études philosophiques.

Countries where authors publish in Les études philosophiques

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Les études philosophiques. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Les études philosophiques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Les études philosophiques more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025