Countries where authors publish in Life Science Alliance
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Life Science Alliance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Life Science Alliance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Life Science Alliance more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Life Science Alliance
This network shows the impact of papers published in Life Science Alliance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Life Science Alliance.
About Life Science Alliance
The 1.6k papers published in Life Science Alliance in the last decades have received a total of 20.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Life Science Alliance usually cover Aging (34 papers), Molecular Biology (1.1k papers), Cell Biology (267 papers), Immunology (253 papers) and Cancer Research (133 papers) specifically the topics of RNA Research and Splicing (168 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (132 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (111 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (108 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (92 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (89 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (85 papers) and Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Life Science Alliance are Marco Salvatore, Gunnar von Heijne, Ole Winther, Henrik Nielsen, José Juan Almagro Armenteros, Arne Elofsson, Olof Emanuelsson, Hannah Limburg, Eva Böttcher‐Friebertshäuser and Wolfgang Garten.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.