Christopher Brooke

28 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers

Christopher Brooke
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Space and Planetary Science 55
  • Conservation 113
  • Earth-Surface Processes 95
  • Geology 76
  • Archeology 116
Replace Gian Pietro Brogiolo with:
Gian Pietro Brogiolo Italy
Carlo Beltrame Italy
Antonio Almagro Spain
Robert L. Hohlfelder United States
Melvin J. Wachowiak United States
Achim Lichtenberger Denmark
Agustín Azkarate Garai-Olaun Spain
Jeanne Marie Teutonico United States
Ian Haynes United Kingdom
Rebeca Blanco-Rotea Spain
Christopher Brooke relative to Gian Pietro Brogiolo Italy Gian Pietro Brogiolo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Gian Pietro Brogiolo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Brooke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Brooke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Brooke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Brooke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Brooke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Brooke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Brooke. The network helps show where Christopher Brooke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Brooke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Brooke Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Brooke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201849
2 199744
3 200630
4 201930
5 199921
6 200716
7 200516
8 202315
9 201212
10 19649
11 20126
12
Studies in the early British church
19735
13 20175
14 20204
15 20164
16
The foundations of medieval English ecclesiastical history: studies presented to David Smith
20053
17 20223
18 20083
19 19943
20
Historia de las civilizaciones
19883

About Christopher Brooke

Christopher Brooke is a scholar working on Archeology, Conservation, Space and Planetary Science, History and Earth-Surface Processes, having authored 31 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (9 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (8 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (6 papers), Building materials and conservation (6 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (4 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (3 papers) and Political Theory and Influence (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (55 citations), Conservation (113 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (95 citations), Geology (76 citations) and Archeology (116 citations). Christopher Brooke has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Howell G. M. Edwards, Ben Clutterbuck, H. G. M. Edwards, Nick Rosser, Margarita Díaz‐Andreu, Dennis W. Farwell, George C. Homans, Hassan Ugail, David G. Stork and David S. Wilkinson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Remote Sensing, Heritage Science and Applied Physics A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact