Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology

313 papers and 2.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 313 papers published in Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology usually cover Social Psychology (143 papers), Sociology and Political Science (121 papers) and Clinical Psychology (91 papers) specifically the topics of Cultural Differences and Values (52 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (44 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology are Sukkyung You, Douglas Paton, KyuLee Shin, Anne Pedersen, Nigar G. Khawaja, Jie Zhang, James H. Liu, Kate Murray, Suk Bong Choi and Martijn van Zomeren.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025