Journal of Neuroscience Methods

355.1k citations
9.3k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
    • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
    • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
    • Neural dynamics and brain function
    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
    • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Papers in

    • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 1.3k
    • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 1.3k
    • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research 423
    • Nerve injury and regeneration 357
    • Neural dynamics and brain function 1.4k
    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 919
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 496

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

8.0k papers receiving 326.2k citations

Peers

Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 122.6k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 126.8k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 14.4k
  • Neurology 28.5k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 8.5k
Replace Current Opinion in Neurobiology with:
Current Opinion in Neurobiology United States
eLife United States
Neuroreport United States
Frontiers in Neuroscience China
Current Biology United States
Cerebral Cortex United States
Progress in Neurobiology United States
Progress in brain research United States
Brain Research Bulletin United States
Cell Reports United States
Journal of Neuroscience Methods relative to Current Opinion in Neurobiology United States Current Opinion in Neurobiology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Current Opinion in Neurobiology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Neuroscience Methods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Neuroscience Methods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Neuroscience Methods more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Neuroscience Methods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

About Journal of Neuroscience Methods

The 9.3k papers published in Journal of Neuroscience Methods in the last decades have received a total of 355.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Neuroscience Methods usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (3.4k papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.7k papers), Developmental Neuroscience (407 papers), Neurology (620 papers) and Biophysics (370 papers) specifically the topics of Neural dynamics and brain function (1.4k papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1.3k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1.3k papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (919 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (496 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (423 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (357 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (331 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Neuroscience Methods are Scott Makeig, Arnaud Delorme, Richard Morris, Jonathan W. Peirce, Eric Maris, Robert Oostenveld, Sandra E. File, George Paxinos, Charles Watson and Piers C. Emson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact