Liver Transplantation

4.7k papers and 168.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.7k papers published in Liver Transplantation in the last decades have received a total of 168.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Liver Transplantation usually cover Hepatology (3.5k papers), Surgery (3.1k papers) and Epidemiology (1.7k papers) specifically the topics of Liver Disease and Transplantation (2.9k papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (2.8k papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (1.4k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Liver Transplantation are Russell H. Wiesner, Michael Charlton, Gary L. Davis, Francis Y. Yao, John P. Roberts, Richard B. Freeman, Marina Berenguer, R. Busuttil, Lorenzo D’Antiga and John J. Fung.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Liver Transplantation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Liver Transplantation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Liver Transplantation.

Countries where authors publish in Liver Transplantation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Liver Transplantation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Liver Transplantation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liver Transplantation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025