Journal of Medical Toxicology

841 papers and 17.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 841 papers published in Journal of Medical Toxicology in the last decades have received a total of 17.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Medical Toxicology usually cover Emergency Medicine (328 papers), Toxicology (115 papers) and Pharmacology (114 papers) specifically the topics of Poisoning and overdose treatments (303 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (103 papers) and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (86 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Medical Toxicology are Lewis S. Nelson, Andrew Stolbach, Josef G. Thundiyil, Jane M. Prosser, Naren Gunja, David M. Wood, Paul I. Dargan, Kavita M. Babu, Jeanmarie Perrone and Maryann Mazer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Medical Toxicology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Medical Toxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Medical Toxicology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Medical Toxicology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Medical Toxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Medical Toxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Medical Toxicology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025