Chris Ackerley
Impact in
-
- Samuel Beckett and Modernism
- Modernist Literature and Criticism
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism
-
- Byzantine Studies and History
Papers in
-
- Samuel Beckett and Modernism 24
- Modernist Literature and Criticism 2
- Comparative and World Literature 1
- Historical and Literary Analyses 1
-
- Vladimir Nabokov Literary Studies 1
- Co-authors
- S. E. Gontarski (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui (7 papers)Journal of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association (3 papers)Modern Drama (1 paper)Eighteenth-Century Life (1 paper)Journal of Beckett Studies (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Chris Ackerley
18 papers receiving 59 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 11
- Literature and Literary Theory 132
- Classics 9
- Philosophy 18
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 10
- History and Philosophy of Science 7
Countries citing papers authored by Chris Ackerley
This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Ackerley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Ackerley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Ackerley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Ackerley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Ackerley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Ackerley. The network helps show where Chris Ackerley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Chris Ackerley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Grove Companion to Samuel Beckett: A Reader's Guide to His Works, Life, and Thought | 2004 | 60 |
| 2 | Obscure Locks, Simple Keys: The Annotated 'Watt' | 2010 | 29 |
| 3 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 1 |
About Chris Ackerley
Chris Ackerley is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and History, having authored 28 papers that have together received 156 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Samuel Beckett and Modernism (24 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (2 papers), Vladimir Nabokov Literary Studies (1 paper), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper), Giambattista Vico and Joyce (1 paper), Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (1 paper), Comparative and World Literature (1 paper) and Historical and Literary Analyses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (132 citations), Classics (9 citations), Philosophy (18 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (10 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (7 citations). Chris Ackerley has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include S. E. Gontarski. Their work appears in journals such as Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, Journal of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association, Modern Drama, Eighteenth-Century Life and Journal of Beckett Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.