Canadian Journal of Bioethics

201 papers and 350 indexed citations i.

About

The 201 papers published in Canadian Journal of Bioethics in the last decades have received a total of 350 indexed citations. Papers published in Canadian Journal of Bioethics usually cover General Health Professions (121 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (79 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (36 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in medical practice (80 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (32 papers) and Health, Medicine and Society (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Canadian Journal of Bioethics are Jocelyn Downie, Marie-Josée Drolet, Lisa Schwartz, Chelsea Gabel, Stacey Marjerrison, Alfredo González‐Ruibal, Zubin Master, Jocelyn Maclure, Ubaka Ogbogu and Blake Murdoch.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Canadian Journal of Bioethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Canadian Journal of Bioethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Canadian Journal of Bioethics.

Countries where authors publish in Canadian Journal of Bioethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Canadian Journal of Bioethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Canadian Journal of Bioethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Canadian Journal of Bioethics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025