JMIR Formative Research

2.9k papers and 13.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.9k papers published in JMIR Formative Research in the last decades have received a total of 13.3k indexed citations. Papers published in JMIR Formative Research usually cover General Health Professions (1.2k papers), Applied Psychology (777 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (532 papers) specifically the topics of Mobile Health Interventions and Applications (775 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (686 papers) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (241 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JMIR Formative Research are LaPrincess C. Brewer, Tiffany C. Veinot, James Shaw, Heather Cole-Lewis, Nnamdi Ezeanochie, Jiancheng Ye, Beth D. Darnall, Parthasarathy Krishnamurthy, Eduardo L. Bunge and S. Raquel Ramos.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in JMIR Formative Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in JMIR Formative Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JMIR Formative Research.

Countries where authors publish in JMIR Formative Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JMIR Formative Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JMIR Formative Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JMIR Formative Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025