Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities
278 papers
receiving
4.0k citations
Peers
Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
Clinical Psychology2.6k
Cognitive Neuroscience1.8k
Psychiatry and Mental health825
Safety Research381
Developmental and Educational Psychology494
Replace Autism in Adulthood with:
Autism in AdulthoodUnited States
Current Developmental Disorders ReportsUnited States
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological ScienceUnited States
MethodologyUnited States
Journal of Substance AbuseUnited States
Down Syndrome Research and PracticeUnited Kingdom
Research in Human DevelopmentUnited States
BioPsychoSocial MedicineJapan
Depression Research and TreatmentUnited States
Applied and Preventive PsychologyUnited States
Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilitiesrelative toAutism in AdulthoodUnited StatesAutism in Adulthood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40.7×
Autism in Adulthood · 1×
×0.83k/4kCP
×0.42k/5kCN
×0.8825/1kPMH
×0.4381/995SR
×0.7494/689DEP
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities.
About Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities
The 303 papers published in Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities in the last decades have received a total of 4.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities usually cover Clinical Psychology (205 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (132 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (70 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (106 papers) and Speech and Hearing (22 papers) specifically the topics of Family and Disability Support Research (162 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (131 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (100 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (46 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (33 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (26 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (26 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities are Johnny L. Matson, Jonathan Wilkins, Cameron L. Neece, Yona Lunsky, Bruce L. Baker, Michelle F. Wright, Sarah Wigham, Jonathan A. Weiss, Violeta Enea and William E. MacLean.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.