Journal of Convergence Information Technology

6.9k citations
2.6k papers · · active since 1951

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of Convergence Information Technology

1.5k papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Journal of Convergence Information Technology
Comparison fields: 5 of 199
  • Leadership and Management 176
  • Information Systems 1.4k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 1.4k
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.5k
  • Management Science and Operations Research 542
Replace American Journal of Applied Sciences with:
American Journal of Applied Sciences Malaysia
Frontiers in Education United States
Thinking Skills and Creativity China
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications China
Systems Research and Behavioral Science United States
Advanced Science Letters Malaysia
Modern Applied Science Malaysia
International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) China
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education China
Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking United States
Journal of Convergence Information Technology relative to American Journal of Applied Sciences Malaysia American Journal of Applied Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.6×
American Journal of Applied Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Convergence Information Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Convergence Information Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Convergence Information Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Convergence Information Technology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Convergence Information Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Convergence Information Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Convergence Information Technology.

About Journal of Convergence Information Technology

The 2.6k papers published in Journal of Convergence Information Technology in the last decades have received a total of 6.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Convergence Information Technology usually cover Leadership and Management (139 papers), Information Systems (562 papers), Computer Networks and Communications (399 papers), Artificial Intelligence (388 papers) and Control and Systems Engineering (280 papers) specifically the topics of Education and Learning Interventions (172 papers), Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues (139 papers), Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies (94 papers), Advanced Algorithms and Applications (93 papers), Health and Wellbeing Research (89 papers), Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks (66 papers), Advanced Computational Techniques and Applications (66 papers) and Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Convergence Information Technology are Shuiqing Yang, Пэйдэ Лю, Yudong Zhang, Lenan Wu, Behrouz Minaei‐Bidgoli, Shih-Jung Wu, Yu Su, Reza Entezari‐Maleki, Chunhua Ju and Zdeněk Bečvář.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact