Modern Applied Science

1.9k papers and 10.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Modern Applied Science in the last decades have received a total of 10.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Modern Applied Science usually cover Mechanical Engineering (202 papers), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (188 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (146 papers) specifically the topics of Organizational and Employee Performance (34 papers), Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (25 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Modern Applied Science are Weng Marc Lim, Ding Hooi Ting, Steenie E. Wallah, Ahmad Mujahid Ahmad Zaidi, Djwantoro Hardjito, Zhongqi He, Ra’ed Masa’deh, Yan Li, Zainudin Awang and Yongliang Liu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Modern Applied Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Modern Applied Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Modern Applied Science.

Countries where authors publish in Modern Applied Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Modern Applied Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Modern Applied Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Modern Applied Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025