Japanese journal of mathematics

494 papers and 7.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 494 papers published in Japanese journal of mathematics in the last decades have received a total of 7.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Japanese journal of mathematics usually cover Mathematical Physics (256 papers), Geometry and Topology (236 papers) and Applied Mathematics (142 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Algebra and Geometry (102 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (99 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Japanese journal of mathematics are Jean‐Michel Lasry, Pierre-Louis Lions, Kazuo Okamoto, Noboru Tanaka, Felipe Cucker, Steve Smale, Victor G. Kač, Karl‐Hermann Neeb, Alberto De Sole and Bang‐Yen Chen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Japanese journal of mathematics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Japanese journal of mathematics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Japanese journal of mathematics.

Countries where authors publish in Japanese journal of mathematics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Japanese journal of mathematics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Japanese journal of mathematics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Japanese journal of mathematics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025