Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

13.0k citations
1.6k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

1.1k papers receiving 8.7k citations

Peers

Interdisciplinary Science Reviews
Comparison fields: 5 of 238
  • History and Philosophy of Science 595
  • Information Systems and Management 669
  • Conservation 248
  • Health Informatics 65
  • Archeology 513
Replace Daedalus with:
Daedalus United States
Theory and Society United States
American Scientist United States
Social Science Information France
Stanford Law Review United States
Economy and Society United Kingdom
The Sociological Review United Kingdom
Feminist Studies United States
Hypatia United States
Current Sociology United Kingdom
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews relative to Daedalus United States Daedalus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Daedalus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Interdisciplinary Science Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Interdisciplinary Science Reviews more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Interdisciplinary Science Reviews.

About Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

The 1.6k papers published in Interdisciplinary Science Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 13.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Interdisciplinary Science Reviews usually cover History and Philosophy of Science (130 papers), Theoretical Computer Science (12 papers), Information Systems and Management (61 papers), Archeology (9 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (37 papers) specifically the topics of Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (49 papers), Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (47 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (46 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (31 papers), History of Science and Natural History (29 papers), Nuclear and radioactivity studies (29 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (23 papers) and History of Science and Medicine (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Interdisciplinary Science Reviews are John J. McDermott, Martha G. Russell, Karin Knorr Cetina, Barnett Rosenberg, Julia B. Bear, Anita Williams Woolley, T. Strasser, Romila Thapar, S. A. Barnett and Rachel Adams.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact