Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

1.5k papers and 9.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Interdisciplinary Science Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 9.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Interdisciplinary Science Reviews usually cover Sociology and Political Science (149 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (119 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (107 papers) specifically the topics of Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (47 papers), Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (44 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Interdisciplinary Science Reviews are John J. McDermott, Martha G. Russell, Barnett Rosenberg, Karin Knorr Cetina, T. Strasser, Anita Williams Woolley, Julia B. Bear, S. A. Barnett, Hubert Schmidbaur and Derek de Solla Price.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Interdisciplinary Science Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Interdisciplinary Science Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Interdisciplinary Science Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025