John Earman

121 papers receiving 3.8k citations

John Earman's Hit Papers

Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. 1994 · 309 citations
3090+16+33Years since publication100200300400

Peers

John Earman
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • History and Philosophy of Science 1.9k
  • Theoretical Computer Science 273
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.3k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 858
  • Philosophy 764
Replace Bas C. van Fraassen with:
Bas C. van Fraassen United States
Michaël Friedman United States
James Ladyman United Kingdom
Tim Maudlin United States
Jeremy Butterfield United Kingdom
Lawrence Sklar United States
Steven French United Kingdom
Michael Redhead United Kingdom
Wesley C. Salmon United States
Craig Callender United States
John Earman relative to Bas C. van Fraassen United States Bas C. van Fraassen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Bas C. van Fraassen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Earman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Earman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Earman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Earman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Earman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Earman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Earman. The network helps show where John Earman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Earman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Earman Line = papers co-authored together John Earman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 126 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Cement of the Universe.
Hit paper breakdown →
1976438
2 1986401
3
Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory.
Hit paper breakdown →
1994309
4 1987230
5
Bayes or bust
1992179
6 1984141
7 1995132
8 1992124
9 1999104
10 199984
11 197181
12 200679
13 199875
14 197474
15 198069
16 200468
17 200467
18
Handbook of the philosophy of physics
200662
19 200259
20 199359

About John Earman

John Earman is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, History and Philosophy of Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Philosophy, having authored 126 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (35 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (33 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (25 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (18 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (13 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (11 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (1.9k citations), Theoretical Computer Science (273 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.3k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (858 citations) and Philosophy (764 citations). John Earman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Greece. Frequent co-authors include John D. Norton, J. L. Mackie, David Christensen, Clark Glymour, John M. Roberts, John Roberts, Bas C. van Fraassen, Jeremy Butterfield, Laura Ruetsche and Jesús Mosterín. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, Synthese, The Journal of Philosophy and Erkenntnis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact