Countries where authors publish in Imaging Science in Dentistry
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Imaging Science in Dentistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Imaging Science in Dentistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Imaging Science in Dentistry more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Imaging Science in Dentistry
This network shows the impact of papers published in Imaging Science in Dentistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Imaging Science in Dentistry.
About Imaging Science in Dentistry
The 812 papers published in Imaging Science in Dentistry in the last decades have received a total of 9.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Imaging Science in Dentistry usually cover Oral Surgery (454 papers), Complementary and Manual Therapy (46 papers), Otorhinolaryngology (52 papers), Rheumatology (138 papers) and General Dentistry (14 papers) specifically the topics of Dental Radiography and Imaging (285 papers), Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (150 papers), Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (107 papers), dental development and anomalies (51 papers), Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (46 papers), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (46 papers), Sinusitis and nasal conditions (43 papers) and Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (38 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Imaging Science in Dentistry are Yun‐Hoa Jung, Bong‐Hae Cho, Min-Suk Heo, Gang Li, Kwang-Joon Koh, Sushma Jaju, Prashant Jaju, Kyoung-A Kim, Jae Joon Hwang and Kyung‐Hoe Huh.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.