International Review of Victimology

525 papers and 6.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 525 papers published in International Review of Victimology in the last decades have received a total of 6.1k indexed citations. Papers published in International Review of Victimology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (426 papers), Clinical Psychology (132 papers) and Health (112 papers) specifically the topics of Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (174 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (152 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (104 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Review of Victimology are Chris Hale, Jo-Anne Wemmers, Edna Erez, Cassandra Cross, Jan van Dijk, David Miers, Frans Willem Winkel, Joanne Belknap, Joanna Shapland and Jo Goodey.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Review of Victimology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Review of Victimology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Review of Victimology.

Countries where authors publish in International Review of Victimology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Review of Victimology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Review of Victimology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Review of Victimology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025