Countries where authors publish in Interface Science
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Interface Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Interface Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Interface Science more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Interface Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Interface Science.
About Interface Science
The 365 papers published in Interface Science in the last decades have received a total of 8.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Interface Science usually cover Materials Chemistry (234 papers), General Materials Science (14 papers), Condensed Matter Physics (37 papers), Atmospheric Science (56 papers) and Mechanical Engineering (108 papers) specifically the topics of Microstructure and mechanical properties (115 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (56 papers), Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (37 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (37 papers), Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties (36 papers), Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques (27 papers), Solidification and crystal growth phenomena (26 papers) and Copper Interconnects and Reliability (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Interface Science are Peter Laugesen, Alison K. Crumbie, Karen Scrivener, Kenneth A. Jackson, Y. Mishin, Akihiro Suzuki, Boris B. Straumal, L.S. Shvindlerman, David J. Srolovitz and Andreas M. Glaeser.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.