Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials

17.6k citations
498 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials

477 papers receiving 17.0k citations

Peers

Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
  • Materials Chemistry 9.9k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 2.8k
  • Biomaterials 1.4k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 6.1k
  • Ceramics and Composites 548
Replace Critical reviews in solid state and materials sciences with:
Critical reviews in solid state and materials sciences United States
Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy United States
Advances in catalysis United States
International Reviews in Physical Chemistry United States
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry United States
Surface Science Spectra United States
Trends in Chemistry United States
Accounts of Materials Research China
International Journal of Inorganic Materials France
Materials Today Advances China
Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials relative to Critical reviews in solid state and materials sciences United States Critical reviews in solid state and materials sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Critical reviews in solid state and materials sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials.

About Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials

The 498 papers published in Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials in the last decades have received a total of 17.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials usually cover Materials Chemistry (281 papers), Ceramics and Composites (26 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (137 papers), Structural Biology (6 papers) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (67 papers) specifically the topics of Crystallization and Solubility Studies (52 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (51 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (48 papers), Solidification and crystal growth phenomena (45 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (33 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (31 papers), Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials (28 papers) and ZnO doping and properties (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials are Amyn S. Teja, K. Byrappa, Tadafumi Adschiri, Gwénaël Gouadec, Philippe Colomban, K. Sangwal, N.B. Singh, Kimberly A. Dick, P. Rudolph and Bernhard Middendorf.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact