Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

3.0k citations
336 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

289 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Communication 623
  • Health Informatics 106
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 296
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 83
  • Education 961
Replace Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline with:
Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline United States
European Journal of Higher Education Germany
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies United States
Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism United States
Knowledge Management & E-Learning An International Journal United States
Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society United States
Business Information Review United Kingdom
Publications United States
New Review of Academic Librarianship United Kingdom
Issues in educational research Australia
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly relative to Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline United States Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Business and Professional Communication Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Business and Professional Communication Quarterly more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Business and Professional Communication Quarterly.

About Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

The 336 papers published in Business and Professional Communication Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 3.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Business and Professional Communication Quarterly usually cover Communication (94 papers), Management of Technology and Innovation (67 papers), Health Informatics (9 papers), Social Psychology (107 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (52 papers) specifically the topics of Communication in Education and Healthcare (71 papers), Management and Marketing Education (62 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (45 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (41 papers), Online and Blended Learning (40 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (29 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (24 papers) and Public Relations and Crisis Communication (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Business and Professional Communication Quarterly are Peter Wilson Cardon, Jolanta Aritz, Benjamin R. Garner, Moonhee Cho, Carolin Fleischmann, Tina A. Coffelt, Stephanie E. Kelly, Minna Logemann, Alan C. Mikkelson and The Anh Phan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact