International Journal of Systematic Theology

709 citations
375 papers · · active since 1999

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 10%
    • Karl Barth and Christian Theology
    • Study and Philosophy of Religion
    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil
    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
    • Christian Theology and Mission

Papers in

    • Karl Barth and Christian Theology 275
    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology 33
    • Augustinian Studies and Theology 24
    • Study and Philosophy of Religion 18
    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation 51

International Journal of Systematic Theology

207 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

International Journal of Systematic Theology
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Philosophy 464
  • Religious studies 190
  • History 123
  • Classics 30
  • Sociology and Political Science 111
Replace Modern Judaism - A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience with:
Modern Judaism - A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience United States
Augustinian Studies United States
International Journal of Hindu Studies United States
International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church United Kingdom
logos Chile
Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy United States
Journal of Religion in Europe Germany
Studies in Christian Ethics United Kingdom
Studia Liturgica United States
Journal of Qur anic Studies United States
International Journal of Systematic Theology relative to Modern Judaism - A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience United States Modern Judaism - A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Modern Judaism - A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Systematic Theology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Systematic Theology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Systematic Theology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Systematic Theology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Systematic Theology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Systematic Theology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Systematic Theology.

About International Journal of Systematic Theology

The 375 papers published in International Journal of Systematic Theology in the last decades have received a total of 709 indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Systematic Theology usually cover Philosophy (321 papers), Religious studies (70 papers), History (62 papers), Sociology and Political Science (39 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (12 papers) specifically the topics of Karl Barth and Christian Theology (275 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (51 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (41 papers), Religious and Theological Studies (33 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (33 papers), Augustinian Studies and Theology (24 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (22 papers) and Study and Philosophy of Religion (18 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Systematic Theology are Oliver D. Crisp, Karen Kilby, Gijsbert van den Brink, John Bainbridge Webster, Robert W. Jenson, Kevin J. Vanhoozer, Brian E. Daley, Jesse Couenhoven, Lieven Boeve and Denys Turner.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact