International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management

1.7k citations
353 papers · · active since 2010

Impact in

Papers in

International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management

303 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Information Systems and Management 245
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 264
  • Marketing 148
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 121
  • Business and International Management 16
Replace International Journal of Management Practice with:
International Journal of Management Practice India
International Journal of Services and Standards United States
Policy & Internet United States
Business Management and Economics Engineering Lithuania
Information Polity United States
International Journal of Business and Systems Research United States
Cuadernos de Gestión Spain
Academy of Information and Management Sciences journal
RAUSP Management Journal Brazil
International Journal of Service Science Management Engineering and Technology India
International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management relative to International Journal of Management Practice India International Journal of Management Practice's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
International Journal of Management Practice · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management.

About International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management

The 353 papers published in International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (59 papers), Marketing (41 papers), Information Systems and Management (39 papers), Business and International Management (4 papers) and Strategy and Management (57 papers) specifically the topics of Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (32 papers), International Business and FDI (18 papers), Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence (17 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (16 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (15 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (12 papers), Employee Performance and Management (12 papers) and Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (11 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management are Neeta Baporikar, Muhammad Anshari, Malik Shahzad Shabbir, Mohammad Nabil Almunawar, Nabila Nisha, Chandra Sekhar Patro, Rupesh Kumar, Weisheng Chiu, Jung-Sup Bae and Siti Fatimahwati Pehin Dato Musa.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact