Information & Culture

231 papers and 496 indexed citations i.

About

The 231 papers published in Information & Culture in the last decades have received a total of 496 indexed citations. Papers published in Information & Culture usually cover Sociology and Political Science (53 papers), Library and Information Sciences (35 papers) and Conservation (32 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Administration (35 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (32 papers) and History of Computing Technologies (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Information & Culture are Andrew L. Russell, James W. Cortada, Nathan Ensmenger, Deanna Marcum, Rebecca Slayton, Blaise Cronin, Christophe Lécuyer, Hallam Stevens, Andrew Dillon and William Aspray.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Information & Culture

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Information & Culture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Information & Culture.

Countries where authors publish in Information & Culture

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Information & Culture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Information & Culture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Information & Culture more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025