Novum Jus

226 papers and 438 indexed citations

About

The 226 papers published in Novum Jus in the last decades have received a total of 438 indexed citations. Papers published in Novum Jus usually cover Political Science and International Relations (140 papers), Law (130 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (92 papers) specifically the topics of Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies (77 papers), Criminal Justice and Penology (76 papers) and Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia (48 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Novum Jus are Germán Silva García, N. Cano, Enrique Mendoza, José Luis González, Andrea Cívico Ariza, Andrew M. Clark, Francisco Ganga Contreras, Daniel Mejía, Juan Pablo Isaza Gutiérrez and Fernando Riveros Munévar.

In The Last Decade

Novum Jus

154 papers receiving 391 citations

Fields of papers published in Novum Jus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Novum Jus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Novum Jus.

Countries where authors publish in Novum Jus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Novum Jus. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Novum Jus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Novum Jus more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026