Human Genetics and Genomics Advances

204 papers and 956 indexed citations i.

About

The 204 papers published in Human Genetics and Genomics Advances in the last decades have received a total of 956 indexed citations. Papers published in Human Genetics and Genomics Advances usually cover Genetics (112 papers), Molecular Biology (110 papers) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (14 papers) specifically the topics of Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (45 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (36 papers) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human Genetics and Genomics Advances are Taylor B. Cavazos, Esther M. John, Laura E. Mitchell, Brian Donovan, Jason L. Vassy, Robert C. Green, Anna Lewis, Zoltán Kutalik, Ming‐Huei Chen and Andrew D. Johnson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Human Genetics and Genomics Advances

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Human Genetics and Genomics Advances. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human Genetics and Genomics Advances.

Countries where authors publish in Human Genetics and Genomics Advances

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human Genetics and Genomics Advances. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human Genetics and Genomics Advances with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Genetics and Genomics Advances more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025