The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies

227 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 227 papers published in The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (108 papers), Political Science and International Relations (73 papers) and Cultural Studies (24 papers) specifically the topics of China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (34 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (24 papers) and Chinese history and philosophy (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies are James C. Scott, Pierre F. Landry, Kjeld Erik Brødsgaard, Verner Worm, Duncan McCargo, Tu Weiming, Hongyi Lai, Gang Chen, Karin Buhmann and James Gomez.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies.

Countries where authors publish in The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025