Countries where authors publish in Human Evolution
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human Evolution. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human Evolution with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Evolution more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Human Evolution. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human Evolution.
About Human Evolution
The 546 papers published in Human Evolution in the last decades have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Human Evolution usually cover Paleontology (137 papers), Anthropology (159 papers), Developmental Biology (30 papers), Archeology (134 papers) and Social Psychology (161 papers) specifically the topics of Primate Behavior and Ecology (155 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (155 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (104 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (92 papers), Paleopathology and ancient diseases (50 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (45 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (41 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (33 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human Evolution are Sheilagh T. Brooks, J. M. Suchey, Torstein Sjøvold, Martín Pickford, Brian T. Shea, Andrew N. Meltzoff, Michael Tomasello, Jo Liska, Nanna Noe‐Nygaard and Terrence W. Deacon.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.