Underground Space

635 papers and 8.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 635 papers published in Underground Space in the last decades have received a total of 8.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Underground Space usually cover Civil and Structural Engineering (459 papers), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (304 papers) and Mechanics of Materials (195 papers) specifically the topics of Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (288 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis (257 papers) and Rock Mechanics and Modeling (140 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Underground Space are Wengang Zhang, Raymond Sterling, Jian Zhou, Danial Jahed Armaghani, Chongzhi Wu, Antonio Bobet, Xiongyao Xie, Anthony T.C. Goh, Suraparb Keawsawasvong and Qian Fang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Underground Space

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Underground Space. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Underground Space.

Countries where authors publish in Underground Space

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Underground Space. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Underground Space with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Underground Space more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025