This map shows the geographic impact of research published in HOMO. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in HOMO with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites HOMO more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in HOMO. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in HOMO.
About HOMO
The 656 papers published in HOMO in the last decades have received a total of 8.8k indexed citations . Papers published in HOMO usually cover Archeology (346 papers), Anthropology (85 papers), Geometry and Topology (42 papers), Archeology (4 papers) and Genetics (76 papers) specifically the topics of Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (309 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (78 papers), Paleopathology and ancient diseases (74 papers), Morphological variations and asymmetry (42 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (36 papers), Dermatoglyphics and Human Traits (29 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (27 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in HOMO are Darren Curnoe, Maryna Steyn, Maciej Henneberg, Daniel Franklin, Nick Milne, Leonard Freedman, Mubarak Ariyo Bidmos, Jana Velemínská, Emanuela Gualdi‐Russo and Valeria Bernal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.