Human Antibodies

536 papers and 4.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 536 papers published in Human Antibodies in the last decades have received a total of 4.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Human Antibodies usually cover Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (251 papers), Molecular Biology (183 papers) and Immunology (183 papers) specifically the topics of Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (246 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (96 papers) and T-cell and B-cell Immunology (73 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human Antibodies are Elrashdy M. Redwan, Susan Zolla‐Pazner, Behzad Baradaran, Mark C. Glassy, Mohammad Taheri, Fatemeh Zare Shahneh, Yehuda Shoenfeld, Stephen D. Gillies, James D. Marks and Jafar Majidi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Human Antibodies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Human Antibodies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human Antibodies.

Countries where authors publish in Human Antibodies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human Antibodies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human Antibodies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Antibodies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025