History Australia

497 papers and 992 indexed citations i.

About

The 497 papers published in History Australia in the last decades have received a total of 992 indexed citations. Papers published in History Australia usually cover Sociology and Political Science (297 papers), Anthropology (82 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (81 papers) specifically the topics of Australian History and Society (207 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (32 papers) and Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (32 papers). The most active scholars publishing in History Australia are Christina Twomey, John T. Murphy, Tony Ballantyne, Robert Foster, Shino Konishi, Shurlee Swain, Graeme Davison, Tom Griffiths, Richard Broome and James Vernon.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in History Australia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in History Australia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in History Australia.

Countries where authors publish in History Australia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in History Australia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in History Australia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites History Australia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025